One of
Portfolio management should be a neutral party supporting decision making. What I mean here is that when different teams work hard on their important initiatives, they become emotionally attached to the topic – this is human nature for all of us. However, to make smart decisions across the portfolio, the portfolio manager should maintain an objective view across different initiatives and support, coach, and assess all initiatives equally.
However, this is easer said than done – also portfolio management professionals get emotionally attached to both people and initiatives, when helping things to get started and throughout execution. Let’s check out few important viewpoints to consider!
Creating a safe environment to align on different viewpoints

The discussions about large strategic initiatives often becomes difficult due to the diverse viewpoints involved. These differing perspectives can at times be completely opposite, making it challenging to reach a consensus. Here are few tips for creating alignment:
- Sharing draft plans early to collect feedback from different parties – seeing a finalized plan which does not take into account our teams/units needs is frustrating
- Having a neutral party to facilitate difficult alignment discussions – to give enough room for different viewpoints – both sides of the coin
- Building portfolio sharing as a part of portfolio process – people have opportunity to learn about what different teams are working on
Comparing apples and oranges?

Another big challenge for objectivity is the wide range of different types of development ideas and projects included in the same portfolio scope. How to compare objectively process improvement ideas, IT development projects, operational excellence improvements, or new offering development?
- Creating strategic buckets for different types of development to keep portfolio balanced – that is, must have activities related M&A do not eat up the whole budget for the IT development, as both have own buckets.
- Defining a simple portfolio management framework – templates and tools are not always well received, but having is common way to define different initiatives ensures, helps to ensure different aspects are defined and thought through for different initiatives – which often also makes initiatives easier to compare
- Data driven decision making & traditional financial methods, such as calculating the net present value or return of investment may also help. Check out more about prioritization methods from the previous blog.
Corporate politics

In large organizations, when different units have own targets and priorities, there may also be corporate politics. Sometimes the decision making is highly political.
- Understand historical factors driving decision making – this may be especially difficult for new people in the organization, but find people who can help you to understand the background better. Also, if you have been working for a long time in the organization, pause on thinking is the history impacting your thinking and objectivity – usually it is to certain extend, as we are all human beings.
- Help project and program managers to do precooking well – ensure alignment within the organization is reached, before heading to big decision making meetings.
- Ensure portfolio governance forums are functioning – if it is difficult to make the decisions, clarify still governance and decision making forums.




